- Title
- Economic burden of advanced lung cancer patients treated by gefitinib alone and combined with chemotherapy in two regions of China
- Creator
- Yang, Kehong; Hua, Susan; Wei, Wenting; Yang, Congyan; Zhu, Xinhai; Li, Shu Chuen
- Relation
- Journal of Medical Economics Vol. 26, Issue 1, p. 1424-1431
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2023.2272536
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2023
- Description
- Aim: To assess the economic burden of different chemotherapies for lung cancer patients and influencing factors in China. Materials and Methods: The economic burden of lung cancer, including direct, indirect and intangible costs was measured within three months after diagnosis and treatment. Direct cost included the cost of hospitalization, outpatient visits, out-of-pocket drug purchases, costs of transportation, accommodation and meal expenses while seeking treatments in hospitals. Cost information was attained from questionnaire and patients' medical record. Indirect cost was measured by the patients' and their caregivers' productive days lost due to outpatient visits and hospitalization for lung cancer treatment. Intangible cost was obtained through the willingness-to-pay method from a questionnaire completed by the patient. Results: Among the total cost of CNY71,401.92, direct cost, indirect cost and intangible cost constituted 89.02%, 4.29%, and 6.69% respectively. Educational level, occupation, family income, lung cancer classification, and the city of residence significantly influenced the total cost. Limitations: Limitations in our study included: First, our follow-up period of three months was relatively short compared to the whole survival period of lung cancer patients. Second, the sample size of the chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy group was not large enough, and the cost data obtained would need confirmation in future studies. Third, participants came from only two localities, which may somewhat limit the representativeness of the study results for the whole of China. Conclusions: The economic burden of lung cancer treatment mainly came from the cost of the drugs. Patients taking chemotherapy had significantly higher cost compared to patients using targeted therapy. The cost was generally higher for those with higher educational level, those with higher family income, and those living in an economically more developed city. Patients with NSCLC had higher cost compared to patients with SCLC. Plain Language Summary: In China, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths and imparts a heavy economic burden. Most lung cancer patients are treated with chemotherapeutic and/of targeted agents because they are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage (IIIB or IV). The use of targeted therapy has achieved high response rates, longer overall survival, and longer progression-free survival compared with conventional chemotherapies. Adverse reactions with targeted therapeutic agents are usually mild compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, targeted drugs for lung cancer are usually more expensive than conventional chemotherapeutic drugs. It should be noted that the adverse effects and toxicities caused by chemotherapeutic drugs are generally more serious compared to targeted drugs; therefore, a number of measures are needed to prevent or relieve these reactions clinically. This can increase the financial burden of lung cancer treatment. Does these two treatments have a different cost? Our results showed that educational level, occupation, family income, classification of lung cancer, and the city of residence significantly influenced the total cost. Patients taking chemotherapy had significantly higher cost compared to patients using targeted therapy. This result suggests that targeted therapy for lung cancer is a better choice than chemotherapy.
- Subject
- cost; economic burden; lung cancer; willingness-to-pay; China
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1498502
- Identifier
- uon:54558
- Identifier
- ISSN:1369-6998
- Rights
- © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4. 0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 207
- Visitors: 221
- Downloads: 14
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Publisher version (open access) | 1 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |